Was the moon landing a giant hoax? Fri, July 17, 2009
Apollo 11 “hoax” theories contend NASA deliberately deceived the public and contend that astronauts never landed on the moon. They say evidence, —including videotape, photographs and rock samples — was manipulated, or even manufactured in a Hollywood-style studio.
lets see wikipedia says guns rockets and combustion engines all are the same. But i'm an idiot
Lets see the links i have posted said there is no atmosphere in the cobustion chamber of a rocket in space because one end is open (how the heck you pressurize something with an open end, i don't know. Oh maybe a star tek force field LMAO) but i'm an idiot
Like i said idiot you are clueless.
But welcome to the world of twitbrain. Are you two related?
wayne, 2009-07-29 21:37:54
uplink, 2009-07-29 16:24:39 You meant "head" doctor.
Not_the_Daddy, 2009-07-29 21:23:19
Maybe Ontario the rocket scientist/brain surgeon will pipe up and settle this once and for all!
ROFL!
uplink, 2009-07-29 16:24:39
Uh, Mc Masters physics...engineering...you couldn't do the math that is required to calculate the force needed to flip a burger.
Not_the_Daddy, 2009-07-29 15:35:22
Wayne idiotically posts: "Ya idiot a bullet and rocket work on the exact same principle. A rocket carries its own fuel and a bullet doesnt "
Gee, and one is driven by a reactive force (in the OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE MASS EXPELLED) and one is a projectile driven in the direction that the EXPLOSION IS VENTED so they bear NO similarity. DUHHHHH. You are a REAL HOOT.
Not_the_Daddy, 2009-07-29 15:33:26
Wayne, the consumate dolt posted: "So please explain how a vaccuum doesn't exist in a rocket combustion chamber in space since it doesn't have a closing valve or door."
Well, combustion is occurring and the chamber is pressurized from the combustion....that should be a....clue. Gotta love your idea that a thin envolope of a vacuum exists in the combustion chamber during a burn so that you can back-pedal on your EXTERNAL COMBUSTION model and that EXPLOSIONS occur in SPACE. You had to get that SPACE indoors....to the combustion chamber-TOO FUNNY....regardless of the verandah nonsense....but really what a bunch of HOOOEY.
Not-the_Daddy, 2009-07-29 15:28:05
here you go idiot.
A gas engine has a pistion in it attached to the crankshaft. When gas is injected into the cylinder and ignited it pushes the piston down turning the crankshaft.
If You detach the piston form the crankshaft and do the same things the piston becomes a bullet and the engine the gun.
If you take out the piston and do the same the engine becomes a rocket.
Get it idiot
wayne, 2009-07-29 12:47:43
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_of_firearms
its funny how the reference you gave describes the Rocket engine as an internal combustion engine (which i agree but added that that open ended chamber on a rocket really means the fuel is outside the craft when detonated, combusted) and a gun as an internal combustion engine. It also describes the fuel as being detonated, combusted, exploded and both work on the exact same principles.
Yet you the genuius you are say they aren't and i am an idiot.
Guess that makes you the idiot. Either that or me and Wikipedia are the idiots.what do you think the chances of that are?
wayne, 2009-07-29 11:24:35
glad you weren't grading me.
You have no clue. Haven't answered one yet. I could take you to university physics but you can't even comprehend high school physics.
God help you trying molecular physics, statics.
If you were even remotely smart you would have questioned the F=MA at contact seeing that when two obfects collide they are actually at zero velocity and acceleration for a brief second meaning all force disappears. but statics and molecular physics shows that nothing is ever at rest even a solid mass (which actually isn't solid in science)
But no you can't even grasp the F=ma formula and how it relates to two objects.
So please explain how a vaccuum doesn't exist in a rocket combustion chamber in space since it doesn't have a closing valve or door.
Ya idiot a bullet and rocket work on the exact same principle. A rocket carries its own fuel and a bullet doesnt
wayne, 2009-07-29 11:14:42
to help you out in the gun
The Gun is M1, the bullet is M2 and the gunpowder is M3.
The gun and bullet do not pass force on (equal and opposite) its the gon and powder (Exploding Gas) and the bullet and powder that pass the force. Not the Gun and bullet
wayne, 2009-07-29 09:54:52
Was the moon landing a giant hoax?
Lets see the links i have posted said there is no atmosphere in the cobustion chamber of a rocket in space because one end is open (how the heck you pressurize something with an open end, i don't know. Oh maybe a star tek force field LMAO) but i'm an idiot
Like i said idiot you are clueless.
But welcome to the world of twitbrain. Are you two related?
wayne, 2009-07-29 21:37:54
Not_the_Daddy, 2009-07-29 21:23:19
ROFL!
uplink, 2009-07-29 16:24:39
Not_the_Daddy, 2009-07-29 15:35:22
Gee, and one is driven by a reactive force (in the OPPOSITE DIRECTION OF THE MASS EXPELLED) and one is a projectile driven in the direction that the EXPLOSION IS VENTED so they bear NO similarity. DUHHHHH. You are a REAL HOOT.
Not_the_Daddy, 2009-07-29 15:33:26
Well, combustion is occurring and the chamber is pressurized from the combustion....that should be a....clue. Gotta love your idea that a thin envolope of a vacuum exists in the combustion chamber during a burn so that you can back-pedal on your EXTERNAL COMBUSTION model and that EXPLOSIONS occur in SPACE. You had to get that SPACE indoors....to the combustion chamber-TOO FUNNY....regardless of the verandah nonsense....but really what a bunch of HOOOEY.
Not-the_Daddy, 2009-07-29 15:28:05
A gas engine has a pistion in it attached to the crankshaft. When gas is injected into the cylinder and ignited it pushes the piston down turning the crankshaft.
If You detach the piston form the crankshaft and do the same things the piston becomes a bullet and the engine the gun.
If you take out the piston and do the same the engine becomes a rocket.
Get it idiot
wayne, 2009-07-29 12:47:43
its funny how the reference you gave describes the Rocket engine as an internal combustion engine (which i agree but added that that open ended chamber on a rocket really means the fuel is outside the craft when detonated, combusted) and a gun as an internal combustion engine. It also describes the fuel as being detonated, combusted, exploded and both work on the exact same principles.
Yet you the genuius you are say they aren't and i am an idiot.
Guess that makes you the idiot. Either that or me and Wikipedia are the idiots.what do you think the chances of that are?
wayne, 2009-07-29 11:24:35
You have no clue. Haven't answered one yet. I could take you to university physics but you can't even comprehend high school physics.
God help you trying molecular physics, statics.
If you were even remotely smart you would have questioned the F=MA at contact seeing that when two obfects collide they are actually at zero velocity and acceleration for a brief second meaning all force disappears. but statics and molecular physics shows that nothing is ever at rest even a solid mass (which actually isn't solid in science)
But no you can't even grasp the F=ma formula and how it relates to two objects.
So please explain how a vaccuum doesn't exist in a rocket combustion chamber in space since it doesn't have a closing valve or door.
Ya idiot a bullet and rocket work on the exact same principle. A rocket carries its own fuel and a bullet doesnt
wayne, 2009-07-29 11:14:42
The Gun is M1, the bullet is M2 and the gunpowder is M3.
The gun and bullet do not pass force on (equal and opposite) its the gon and powder (Exploding Gas) and the bullet and powder that pass the force. Not the Gun and bullet
wayne, 2009-07-29 09:54:52