I guess hes the least worst of the 3. But big city cons are soviet slum lords, and small town cons arent much different then bountiful b.c./branch davidian
freddy, 2013-05-02 11:30:36

I see dad after being told he was posting something totaly unrelated to harper wanting to slash Canadian soldiers pay because he said they were not in a danger zone, comes back with name calling and childishness. Rather than saying thankyou for pointing out his mistake.

But like I said. Dad thought the CPP and the OAP were the same thing
Mrs-Brigand, 2013-04-26 19:21:54

Only one idiot thinks Harper woke up one morning and decided to re-classify military pay scales for those involved in training missions in Afghanistan.

In fact, the DOD differentiates, through pay, between COMBAT and TRAINING roles. It is properly combat pay, if it were simply danger pay the village idiot would probably qualify because eating mickey D re-burgers is inherently dangerous.
Not_the_Daddy, 2013-04-25 06:56:22

Still wondering why posted this..

"The REAL story is 100 soldiers were overpaid up to $1,600 each. BUREAUCRATS, following standard procedure, issued letters requesting the OVERPAYMENTS be reimbursed to the government."

Just what has that to do with harper wanting to take away 500 dollars a month from Canadian soldiers because harper says they are no longer in a dangerous situation?

Course dad thinks the CPP and OAP are the same thing so maybe that explains it.
Mrs-Brigand, 2013-04-24 22:24:58

Well dad. That is not the story. harpoon and his CONS have said the brave Canadian soldiers are not in a dangerous place in Afghanistan and because of that that would see a reduction of 500 dollars a month. Try staying on topic and you may learn something
Mrs-Brigand, 2013-04-24 20:02:35

Again I ask, are these the same soldiers you called cowards and murders in the Afghanstan topic?

So, lie and deny or fess up and bear the shame!

twit post:

"our brave soldiers""

"out respected soldiers"

Mrs-Brigand, 2013-04-23 19:51:34
The Crusher, 2013-04-24 15:47:48

The Crusher, 2013-04-17 10:32:29 The REAL story is 100 soldiers were overpaid up to $1,600 each. BUREAUCRATS, following standard procedure, issued letters requesting the OVERPAYMENTS be reimbursed to the government. That caused an uproar because federal dipper or liberal swivel servants did their jobs, for once...after making the initial mistake. Because swivel servants made the initial mistake, and because the recipients were soldiers, MacKay intervened:

"It would not be right to penalize those families for the department's error, so we will not be asking the soldiers to pay back the difference."

Not_the_Daddy, 2013-04-23 20:33:40

Og geez. Now crusher is saying the harper changed his mind about clawing back danger pay from our brave soldiers because he listened to the people.Yea he heard what people were saying but that isnt why he decided not to steal money from out respected soldiers
Mrs-Brigand, 2013-04-23 19:51:34

I agree. Harper is truly a man of CONviction, unlike many of his liberal predecessors.

BTW, where would you get your jollies if the conservatives changed their party name to somethign that didn't contain the consecutive letters con?

Imagine though, a government actually listening and reacting to feedback from the public? Is that outrageous or what? Most people would probably think that was a good thing, but I guess if you are steeped in liberal tradition, this behaviour comes as a complete shock. Twas quite obvious in old Cretins' "town hall meetings" where he simply blew off any question he didn't want to deal with by mumbling something comletely off topic and crying "NEXT" (Yes RMB, we know where you get that from...)
The Crusher, 2013-04-17 10:32:29

Funny how people like Crusher and fuom can be CONned by harper. harper had said Afghanistan is not a danger to our brave soldiers so he said their pay wwould be cut 500 dollars a month. Then when the outrage started harpoon said he would review that policy. fuom interprets that to mean harper is doing a good thing whereas the only reason harpoon is having it reviewed is because of the outrage. What a CON that harper is
Mrs-Brigand, 2013-04-16 19:57:08