Politics

 

November 3, 2009  
VIDEO GALLERY
PHOTO GALLERIES
COMMENT ON A STORY
ACROSS CANADA
WORLD WATCH
LATEST BREAKING NEWS
WEIRD NEWS
CRIME
POLITICS
DAILY FEATURE
MEDIA NEWS
SCIENCE
GREEN NEWS
GOOD NEWS
TECHNOLOGY
Sun Papers
Columnists
Lotteries
Weather
RSS Feed
Do MPs spend too much time Tweeting?
Yes
No
I don't care


Results | Story


Families: Parents unknowingly putting kids at risk
By Peter Zimonjic, SUN MEDIA
Bookmark and Share




OTTAWA—Parents are unknowingly putting their children at risk of exposure to lead and other toxic substances because of inadequate product labelling, according to the latest report from Canada’s environmental watchdog.

The Auditor General’s Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development, Scott Vaughan, studied seven of 85 substances listed as toxic by the feds and found several areas in need of improvement.

“Labelling is a control measure that can be useful in informing consumers of the presence of toxic substances in products they purchase,” the report said. “Regarding two of the substances we examined, dichloromethane and lead, labels for consumer products that may contain these substances do not fully inform consumers of the potential hazards these products may pose.”

Some of the products found to contain unsafe levels of toxins, if people are exposed over long periods of time, include children’s toys, batteries and paint products.

The report said the federal government should revise its ‘management strategies’ for toxic substances and require companies to label products so they inform consumers of the hazards associated with long-term exposure.

The report also pointed out a lack of federal power to control potentially toxic consumer items.

“For those products that contain lead above the regulated limits, Health Canada lacks powers that would allow it to issue mandatory product recalls,” the report said. “It must negotiate voluntary recalls with industry.”

The audit also found that Environment Canada spends $6.3 million annually to inventory pollutants emitted by major industries but the system lacks any real value, in part, because industries self-report their emissions.

“Environment Canada does not routinely conduct on-site visits to verify facilities’ data input and, as a result, there is limited, on-site checking of data quality,” the report said. “Efforts to ensure that facilities comply focus largely on having them submit reports on time.”

Peter.zimonjic@sunmedia.ca






Environment C-Health Galleries